Walking forward and/or walking forward backward?
I have a dilemma. Last night while reading the book, Impro, I came across an insightful comment that I highlighted, "The improvisor (story teller) has to be like a man walking backward. He sees where he has been, but he pays no attention to the future. His story can take him anywhere, but he must still 'balance' it, and give it shape, by remembering incidents that have been shelved and reincorporating them." Keith Johnstone's point is that great stories have interrelated ideas, connected to one another and are not a series of ideas strung together with no form. Storytellers interrelate the past with the future in meaningful ways.
On the other hand, I read today from Erwin McManus' book, Chasing Daylight, "We were not created to walk backward into the future. Just the decision to look forward to the future has a healing power in itself." Within it's context, this quote is referring to getting unstuck from the past that is holding us back from pursuing the future.
Are McManus and Johnstone talking about the same thing or different things?
As a storyteller, I resonate with Johnstone because he's exactly right. We do weave in the past and build on it as we move forward. As a Christian and human being, I resonate with McManus that I do need to move boldly forward toward the future.
If I put these two thoughts together, I realize that as I weave the story of my life, making choices toward the future, I do so at God's lead. But I am also a product of my past and our collective past. I'm not stuck in the past, but I do stand on the shoulders of the saints (as one theologian aptly put it) peering toward the future.
What do you think?
Share
You need to be a member of The Applied Improvisation Network to add comments!
Join this network